Take the Coastside Transportation Survey – Rick Nahass

Commute.org’s mission is to reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by commuters to decrease congestion, improve the environment, and enhance quality of life. 

Spearheaded by commute.org Board Members Mike O’Neill, Pacifica, and Deborah Penrose, Half Moon Bay, the feedback from this four question survey will be used in conjunction with previous county outreach programs, such as Reimagine SamTrans, to determine next steps for better enabling people to use alternate transit methods.

The fourth question is intended for free form open comments. Please take the time to consider how you might answer this question:

“If you have any other comments or suggestions for how to support and encourage Coastside residents to use alternatives to driving alone, please use the space below to let us know.”

Take the survey (Click Here).

Help us Get the word out to get full representation from all coastside residents from Pescadero to Pacifica by forwarding survey link.

Author Rick Nahass, Pacifica Climate Committee

SamTrans “Reimagine Program” is asking for public feedback on 2022 pandemic bus route alternatives (see below). Missing is the longstanding requirement for highway CA1 express bus service from Half Moon Bay to Daly City BART. Let SamTrans know this is the coastside requirement for fair and equitable recovery:

Please let SamTrans know that you want them to Expand the 118  express bus service from Half Moon Bay to Day City BART to run 7 days a week continuously from early morning to late evening. The benefits are:

Economic Development

• Small businesses would have access to a greater workforce who would be more willing to take jobs if bus transit was more available and cost efficient.
• Accessibility to jobs at coastside small merchants and farms for families that have one or no cars
• Promotion and marketing (easy to take the bus instead of sitting in traffic) to out-of-town Visitors to drive tourism revenue
• Realtor promotion of faster access to San Francisco connections to prospective home buyers

Mobility Equity

• Greater access up and down the coast for senior citizens
• Student access to schools, shortening or eliminating special school routes

Environmental Benefits

• Reduce highway one road congestion 7 days a week, with proper economic development marketing
• Reduces coastside carbon footprint by removing cars from the road

To comment:

Attend the Zoom meeting
Coastside Meeting (Pacifica, Montara, Moss Beach, Half Moon Bay)
Wednesday, May 5, 2021, 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm
Meeting Link: http://bit.ly/reimaginecoast
Call in Option: (669) 900-6833
Zoom Webinar ID: 990 1019 9651
Languages: Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese

OR Send email to reimagine@samtrans.com

The following are the Coastside Reimagine Alternatives

Alternative 1 Key Changes – Direct, High-frequency Service within our County

• Route 112 would be shortened to operate between Sharp Park and Serramonte. It would operate every 30 minutes on weekdays instead of hourly. Route 110 service would improve to every 30 minutes seven days a week.
• Route 118 would run between Pacifica and Colma BART instead of continuing on to Daly City BART to be more reliable.
• Route 294 would no longer serve College of San Mateo due to low ridership and would operate hourly during midday on weekdays instead of every two hours.

Alternative 2 Key Changes – Improved Connections to Rail and the Region

• Route 112 would be shortened to operate between Sharp Park and Colma BART.
• Two routes would serve the growing employment areas in Oyster Point.
• Route 294 would no longer serve College of San Mateo due to low ridership, providing a faster trip for those traveling between the Bay and the Coastside.

Alternative 3 Key Changes – Retain Geographic Coverage

• Route 112 would be deleted. Route 110 frequency would improve to every 30 minutes seven days a week. Riders wishing to travel to Serramonte or Colma BART would need to transfer.
• Route 294 would improve midday weekday frequency to every 60 minutes, up from every 120 minutes.
• A new on-demand service in Half Moon Bay would be implemented. A ride on a smaller vehicle, which could be reserved with a phone call or via an app, would provide service anywhere within the zone.

Organizations and Individuals who support the “Coastside Bus Corridor” Expansion of the SamTrans 118 express bus service from Half Moon Bay to Day City BART to run 7 days a week continuously from early morning to late evening:

• Pacifica Climate Committee

To add you name to the list of supporters send email to ricknahass@coastcommute.org

April 1 – Pacific Beach Coalition Earth Month kickoff with Jackie Speier, Josh Becker, Kevin Mullin & David Canepa

• Click Here to Register for free
• Click Here for Facebook Event Page

[pdf-embedder url=”https://www.pacificavoice.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Press-Release_BLMDC-01_22_21.pdf” title=”Press Release_BLMDC 01_22_21″]

Pacificans Sue the City of Pacifica Over Violation of CEQA and California’s Planning and Land Use Laws.
Coalition of Pacificans for an Updated Plan and Responsible Planning (CPUP)

Note: See Pacifica Voice August 2020 Edition for the original article on “A LETTER ON DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Author Summer Lee” 

Pacifica, December 21st, 2020 — Kristin Cramer and the Coalition of Pacificans for an Updated Plan and Responsible Planning (CPUP)* filed litigation today against the City of Pacifica to force the City’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and California’s Planning and Land Use Laws regarding the proposed Vista Mar development on Monterey Road. The plaintiffs are represented by the Law Offices of Brian Gaffney APC in conjunction with Lozeau | Drury LLP.

The development consists of 8 luxury condominiums on a 1.2 acre property with a 52% slope and a history of landslides. The project would require clearing 57 trees, paving over a probable wetland, and excavating 6,453 cubic yards of soil. At City Planning and City Council meetings, neighbors voiced concerns about environmental degradation, as well as increased risks of landslides and erosion on a hillside that already struggles with flooding on an annual basis.

Four experts from the fields of biology, hydrology, air quality and geology supplied testimony that provided substantial evidence of environmental consequences that are not adequately mitigated. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), such expert testimony requires an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be performed before development can occur. Despite these laws, the City Council voted to approve the project at the appeal hearing on November 23rd.

“We are community members on a journey of unfortunate discovery. In the beginning we thought the City didn’t understand the problems of the Vista Mar project. We went to great lengths to research and present the technical problems with the site and to our surprise were faced with a City that wasn’t listening and was using a type-written document from 1980 to base its decision-making. We banded together with our collective resources to support what is our last-resort — a legal remedy to compel the city to keep its citizens safe,” said Summer Lee, an artist, who is co-founder of CPUP.

The lawsuit will also focus on the City’s failure to comply with their General Plan, which has not been comprehensively updated since 1980, making Pacifica’s one of the oldest in the state. The General Plan is the set of documents that detail the guiding standards on which a city must base its land use and development decisions. The lawsuit contends that as it stands, the document is legally inadequate, fatally out of date, and internally inconsistent. For example, the Safety Element of the General Plan was altered in 1983, after an El Niño event resulted in over 475 landslides in Pacifica, large-scale evacuations and the unfortunate loss of life. Despite this, the city’s landslide and erosion maps have not been updated to include the City’s most common type of landslide (“debris-flow” slides), which have been recorded on the Vista Mar property. Additionally, the Vista Mar project is inconsistent with numerous General Plan policies which promote protection of significant trees, creeks and riparian habitats, prohibit development on slopes over 40%, maintain natural open space between areas of development, and discourage mass grading and terracing.

“It is shocking to find that the City has not updated its General Plan Safety Element given the technical information in the reports that they themselves commissioned. We are genuinely concerned with neighborhood safety given the history of landslides and flooding on this hillside and we do not have adequate scientific information on which to base the planning review of the project. The 1980 General Plan calls for thorough geotechnical investigations and somehow the City has allowed the project to rely on only two shallow soil borings, neither of which were done where the buildings are proposed,” said Christine Boles, a neighbor and licensed architect.

In reaction to the events of the Vista Mar project approval, CPUP, an unincorporated organization, was formed to address a wider pattern of similar decision-making throughout the City. CPUP believes this state of affairs is enabled by a General Plan that has not been brought up to date to consider the current state of scientific data and the city’s infrastructure, and asserts that until the General Plan is updated, all other development that raises the same issues in regard to the General Plan should be put on hold.

*CPUP is a project of Pacifica’s Environmental Family, a 501(c)(3) organization that supports environmental stewardship and education in the City of Pacifica. For more information, go to www.CPUP.org